Introduction: The Invisible Framework
In clinical supervision, much is said about theory, technique, and ethical practice. Yet what often goes unspoken is the underlying emotional current that shapes how supervision is experienced: attachment. Just as clients bring their attachment histories into the therapeutic relationship, supervisees unconsciously bring theirs into the supervisory space. These patterns can profoundly influence how learning is received, feedback is integrated, and trust is built or resisted.
This article explores how different supervisee attachment styles impact the supervision process and how supervisors can respond effectively to foster growth, safety, and self-awareness.
A Brief Overview of Attachment Theory
Attachment theory, developed by John Bowlby and expanded by Mary Ainsworth and others, explains how early relationships with caregivers form internal working models for future relational experiences. These models persist into adulthood and influence how we seek connection, manage distance, and respond to stress.
The core attachment styles include:
- Secure Attachment: Characterised by comfort with closeness and autonomy.
- Anxious (Preoccupied) Attachment: Marked by a strong need for reassurance, fear of abandonment, and hyper-sensitivity to perceived rejection.
- Avoidant (Dismissive) Attachment: Defined by emotional distancing, discomfort with dependence, and a tendency to suppress needs.
- Disorganised Attachment: Involving a mix of approach and avoidance, often rooted in unresolved trauma or fear.
These styles don’t remain confined to personal relationships—they show up in professional ones too, including supervision.
Read more about attachment on https://wellnesscounsellingservice.com/how-early-childhood-experiences-shape-our-relationships-and-our-ability-to-trust/
Supervision as an Attachment Relationship
Supervision is not just a functional task—it is a relational process. For many practitioners, especially those early in their careers, the supervisor represents both a guide and an authority figure. As such, the supervisory relationship often activates attachment patterns, particularly under stress, challenge, or vulnerability.
The supervision space becomes a kind of emotional echo chamber where early relational dynamics can re-emerge. Understanding this helps supervisors respond with more attunement and emotional intelligence.
The Securely Attached Supervisee
Supervisees with secure attachment are often able to:
- Engage openly with feedback.
- Reflect on their clinical work without excessive defensiveness or self-doubt.
- Acknowledge limits and seek guidance when needed.
- Maintain professional boundaries while fostering warmth and connection.
These supervisees often make steady progress, but they are not without challenges. Their comfort may mask subtle avoidance of deeper emotional themes. A skilled supervisor helps them stretch by encouraging reflective risk-taking and deeper vulnerability.
The Anxiously Attached Supervisee
Anxiously attached supervisees often crave approval and reassurance. Supervision may trigger deep fears of getting it wrong or being abandoned. Common behaviours include:
- Over-preparing for supervision.
- Seeking excessive validation.
- Becoming distressed or discouraged by neutral or critical feedback.
- Reading too much into supervisor responses (e.g., tone, silence).
This style may create a dependency dynamic where the supervisee defers excessively to the supervisor. Alternatively, they may over-apologise or mask their uncertainty with intellectualisation.
Supervisory responses:
- Provide consistent, warm, and clear boundaries.
- Frame feedback within a relational and developmental context.
- Name and normalise anxiety.
- Encourage self-trust and resilience through graded autonomy.
The Avoidantly Attached Supervisee
Avoidant supervisees may appear self-reliant, confident, or even aloof. However, this independence may mask discomfort with vulnerability or receiving help. Common behaviours include:
- Keeping supervision task-focused or surface-level.
- Avoiding discussions of personal reactions or feelings.
- Downplaying difficulties in their clinical work.
- Reacting to feedback with minimisation or withdrawal.
These supervisees may struggle to form a meaningful supervisory alliance, even though they might perform well externally.
Supervisory responses:
- Respect the supervisee’s need for space while gently inviting reflection.
- Create safety around vulnerability by modelling it.
- Use curiosity rather than confrontation to explore emotional avoidance.
- Highlight strengths while normalising areas for growth.
The Disorganised Attached Supervisee
Disorganised attachment often stems from relational trauma and can manifest in supervision as confusion, inconsistency, or emotional dysregulation. Behaviours might include:
- Fluctuating between closeness and withdrawal.
- Being triggered by authority or ambiguity.
- Inconsistent attendance or engagement.
- Idealising and devaluing the supervisor in cycles.
This supervisee may long for connection but fear it at the same time. Supervision can feel unsafe, even when offered with care.
Supervisory responses:
- Establish a calm, structured, and predictable environment.
- Name the rupture and repair cycles gently.
- Refer for therapy if unresolved trauma is impacting supervision.
- Collaborate on creating a secure working alliance.
The Supervisor’s Own Attachment Style
Supervision is not a one-way process. The supervisor’s own attachment history and style also play a vital role. A dismissive supervisor may reinforce avoidant patterns; a preoccupied one might collude with anxious dynamics.
Self-awareness and reflective practice are crucial. Supervisors benefit from:
- Supervision of supervision.
- Personal therapy.
- Reflective journals or peer discussion.
Creating a secure base in supervision means modelling secure attachment: consistency, empathy, appropriate boundaries, and responsiveness.
Parallel Process and Attachment Echoes
Parallel process refers to how dynamics in the therapeutic relationship can unconsciously replay in supervision. For example:
- A therapist feeling rejected by a client may fear disapproval from their supervisor.
- A supervisee mirroring a client’s dependency or avoidance with the supervisor.
Understanding parallel process through the lens of attachment helps deepen supervision. It allows for metacommunication—talking about the relationship as it unfolds in real time.
This can be as simple as saying: “I notice you seemed quieter today. I wonder if something about our conversation has felt difficult?”
Example: During a supervision session, Sarah, a therapist in training, spoke about a client who she described as “distant and hard to reach.” She said the client often sat in silence, giving short answers and avoiding eye contact. As Sarah spoke, her own body language mirrored the same dynamic—she sat back in her chair, arms folded, and her tone became flat and disengaged. Her supervisor, noticing this shift, gently reflected, “I wonder if what’s happening between you and your client might also be showing up here between us.” Sarah paused, surprised, and slowly realised she had felt dismissed by the supervisor in a previous session, leading her to unconsciously withdraw in the same way her client had with her. By exploring this moment together, they uncovered a powerful parallel process: Sarah’s emotional response to the supervisory relationship was echoing the therapeutic relationship. This insight allowed Sarah to empathise more deeply with her client and opened space for repairing the supervisory bond as well.
Trauma-Informed and Culturally Sensitive Supervision
Attachment does not exist in a vacuum. It is influenced by culture, race, gender, sexuality, neurodiversity, and systemic trauma. A trauma-informed and inclusive supervisory stance recognises:
- The impact of intergenerational trauma.
- How marginalisation affects attachment and help-seeking.
- The power dynamics inherent in supervision.
Cultural humility, ongoing learning, and a willingness to be challenged are essential in providing a secure base for diverse supervisees.
Building a Secure Supervision Alliance
Whatever a supervisee’s attachment style, the goal is not to fix them—but to provide a relational space where security can grow. This includes:
- Consistency: Keeping agreements, starting and ending on time.
- Attunement: Listening deeply and responding with empathy.
- Challenge: Offering honest feedback in a holding way.
- Encouragement: Naming growth and potential.
A secure supervision relationship becomes a rehearsal space for secure therapeutic relating.
Conclusion: The Healing Potential of Supervision
Attachment theory invites us to see supervision not merely as oversight, but as relationship. When supervisors are attuned to the emotional undercurrents shaped by attachment, they create a space where vulnerability is met with safety—and growth becomes possible.
By meeting supervisees not just as practitioners, but as people with complex relational histories, supervision becomes a transformative encounter. It echoes the core message of secure attachment: “You matter. You’re not alone. It’s safe to grow here.”
🔎 Visit my Blog – to learn more, or my website www.wellnesscounsellingservice.com or my page on Psychology Today Elena Ward, Counsellor, Ruislip, HA4 | Psychology Today or Counselling Directory Counsellor Elena Ward – Dover & Ruislip – Counselling Directory to book a counselling or supervision session in Kent or Ruislip.
Alternatively visit Psychology Today https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb or Counselling Directory Counselling Directory – Find a Counsellor Near You to find a Counsellor or a Supervisor in your area.
Resources
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bennett-Levy, J., Lee, N., Travers, K., Pohlman, S., & Hamernik, E. (2022). Reflective practice in clinical supervision: A model for supervisee self-awareness and development. Clinical Psychology Forum, 343, 10–15.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Routledge.
Carroll, M. (2009). Supervision: Critical reflection for transformational learning (Part 2). The Clinical Supervisor, 28(1), 1–19.
Holmes, J. (2015). Attachment in therapeutic practice. Sage.
Liotti, G. (2004). Trauma, dissociation, and disorganized attachment: Three strands of a single braid. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 41(4), 472–486.
Milne, D. (2009). Evidence-based clinical supervision: Principles and practice. Wiley-Blackwell.
Sussman, M. B. (2007). A curious calling: Unconscious motivations for practicing psychotherapy. Jason Aronson.
Trevethan, L., & Hinds, N. (2020). The supervisory alliance and supervisee attachment: What does the research tell us? The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 13, e5.
Watkins, C. E. (2011). Development of the psychotherapy supervisor: Review of and reflections on 30 years of theory and research. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 45–57.